正文 調Q1064nm激光和IPL治療黃褐斑的療效比較(1 / 3)

調Q1064nm激光和IPL治療黃褐斑的療效比較

皮膚美容

作者:周穎華 郝思輝 倪小麗等

[摘要]目的:探討調Q1 064nm激光和IPL治療黃褐斑的療效比較。方法:選取黃褐斑患者52例(女46例,男6例),隨機分為兩組,每組26例。實驗1組:采用大光斑低能量調Q1 064nm激光治療,每月治療1次,連續治療8次,每次治療前後進行拍照對比,並檢測黑度(MI)和黃褐斑麵積(S)的評分;實驗2組:采用強脈衝光治療,選擇波長為570nm,每月治療1次,連續治療8次。兩組均治療結束後3個月進行回訪,觀察治療後的複發率。結果:實驗1組總有效率達96.15%,實驗2組總有效率達84.62%,兩組療效比較存在統計學差異(P

[關鍵詞]黃褐斑;激光;大光斑低能量;Q1 064nm

[中圖分類號]R758.4+2 [文獻標誌碼]A [文章編號]1008-6455(2015)11-0063-03

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical effect of Q1 064nm laser and IPL in the treatment of chloasma. Methods 52 patients with chloasma(46women,6 men)were collected and equally divided into two groups:experiment group 1 and experiment group 2.The patients ofexperiment group 1 were treated with philton large spot low-energy Q-switched laser monthly until 8 times.Patients were asked to visit the doctor within 3 months after treatment,observing the recurrence rate,MI and S score. Photos were taken to compare the before and after treatment.The patients ofexperiment group 1 were treated with IPL intense pulsed light fly produced by the 2nd Dayton of Israeli monthly until 8 times, using the Q1 064nm laser.Patients were asked to visit the doctor within 3 months after treatment, observing the recurrence rate. Results The total effective rate of the experimental group 1 and experimental group 2were 96.15%and 84.62%,respectively.There was a significant difference between experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 in terms of the degree of influence.Conclusion The research results show that the Q1 064nm laser and IPL treatment has curative effect on chloasma,but adjustable Q1 064nm laser treatment of chloasma curative effect is better than IPL curative effect.

Key words:chloas;laser;Large spot low energy;Q1 064nm