that was only the first trouble.the second lay in the tone of the productions.leading articles which include gems such as "back of such and such a place,"or,"we noticed,tuesday,such an event,"or,"don't"for "does not,"are things to be accepted with thankfulness.all that made me want to cry was that in these papers were faithfully reproduced all the war-cries and "back-talk"of the palmer house bar,the slang of the barber-shops,the mental elevation and integrity of the pullman car porter,the dignity of the dime museum,and the accuracy of the excited fish-wife.i am sternly forbidden to believe that the paper educates the public.then i am compelled to believe that the public educate the paper;yet suicides on the press are rare.
just when the sense of unreality and oppression was strongest upon me,and when i most wanted help,a man sat at my side and began to talk what he called politics.
i had chanced to pay about six shillings for a travelling-cap worth eighteen-pence,and he made of the fact a text for a sermon.he said that this was a rich country,and that the people liked to pay two hundred per cent,on the value of a thing.they could afford it.he said that the government imposed a protective duty of from ten to seventy per cent on foreign-made articles,and that the american manufacturer consequently could sell his goods for a healthy sum.thus an imported hat would,with duty,cost two guineas.the american manufacturer would make a hat for seventeen shillings,and sell it for one pound fifteen.
in these things,he said,lay the greatness of america and the effeteness of england.competition between factory and factory kept the prices down to decent limits,but i was never to forget that this people were a rich people,not like the pauper continentals,and that they enjoyed paying duties.