The author states quite clearly on which previous studies his prent work builds; and more importantly, he specifies where his own inality lies, or in other words, in which dires his study expands from the previous ones.
"Ued" binations of elements
Here the w label "bination of elements" refers to a variety of things: a new perspective on a perennial issue, application of a theory to a field for the first time, a neroach to an old problem, and suchlike. What is meant by "ued" is that the elements should be bined in such ways as have never been done before, hehe guarantee inality. Developing totally new ideas is extremely difficult, though irely impossible, so biniing elements in new ways is probably an easy path towards creativity. sider the example below, which is an abstract to a journal article: her the lived body, taken up by Merleau-Ponty after Husrl, nor the libidinal body theorized by psyalysts after Freud, be reduced to the ted, measured, physical body, apprehended only from outside.
The author states quite clearly on which previous studies his prent work builds; and more importantly, he specifies where his own inality lies, or in other words, in which dires his study expands from the previous ones.
"Ued" binations of elements
Here the w label "bination of elements" refers to a variety of things: a new perspective on a perennial issue, application of a theory to a field for the first time, a neroach to an old problem, and suchlike. What is meant by "ued" is that the elements should be bined in such ways as have never been done before, hehe guarantee inality. Developing totally new ideas is extremely difficult, though irely impossible, so biniing elements in new ways is probably an easy path towards creativity. sider the example below, which is an abstract to a journal article: her the lived body, taken up by Merleau-Ponty after Husrl, nor the libidinal body theorized by psyalysts after Freud, be reduced to the ted, measured, physical body, apprehended only from outside.
Both phenomenology and psyalysis t forth the priority of a global subjective lived body, approached "from within". However, their perspectives em to differ when it es to the ception of the interiority of this lived body, which psyalysis deems as imaginary. This paper examihe similarities and discrepancies between the Merleau-Pontyan phenomenological body and the Freudian erogenous body. It attempts to show how the very categories of perception and imagination are reverd when moving from one disciplio the other. It cludes by proposing some lines along which the parison could be prolonged. （Ayouch, T. （2008）. Lived body and fantasmatic body: The debate between phenomenology and psyalysis. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical psychology, 28, 336355.）